I must admit that before my latest visit to Zambia, I didn’t know that much about “lion walks”, lion “cub-petting” and other similar “animal encounter” activities, either in Zambia or here at home in South Africa. But from the little I did know, something didn’t seem right to me. I’ve always felt that wild animals should be exactly that: wild. I’m no conservationist, but exposing a young lion cub to human contact always seemed a strange way to help that lion subsequently have a happy adult existence in the “wild”.
I was prompted to look more into this topic by a chance conversation with a former employee at Lion Encounter in Vic Falls whilst in South Luangwa National Park a few months back. I’d asked what he had done for work before guiding in the park, and when he said he used to work for Lion Encounter I shared my skepticism about such “projects” and asked for his opinions, and why he left Lion Encounter. The scathing and heart-wrenching story he gave me left me feeling that I had to find out more.
So once back in Cape Town, I began to do some research and found that there were a number of articles questioning the ethics and methods of Lion Encounter and similar “projects” and/or operators, many of them echoing my own initial doubts but with a lot more academic weight behind them.
I remained in contact with the former Lion Encounter employee in South Luangwa who also put me in touch with a number of other former employees and volunteers, all of whom gave similar testimonies of disillusionment and deceit without any prompting from me.
Some of the most commonly raised grievances were the poor treatment of Lion Encounter staff and volunteers, the even poorer treatment (and sometimes utter neglect) of the lions, the failure to release or rehabilitate one single lion into the wild since 1999 and the mismanagement of funds.
But most pertinent of all were the repeated assertions by volunteers and former employees from Lion Encounter that their lions were (or still are) being sold into canned hunting, a concern that mirrors the current furore around Lion Park in South Africa, following the admission by the owner that Lion Park had sold lions into canned hunting less than two years ago. As far as Lion Encounter is concerned, as one volunteer puts it, though it is hard to actually get concrete proof that any of their lions have ended up being shot in a canned hunt: “if they (Lion Encounter) deny it I would like to know where are all those cubs are going? Seriously, with as much as they breed, otherwise the continent would be spilling over with lions”.
It can be argued quite convincingly that certain types of hunting as well as the significant revenue that can be garnered from hunting can potentially, in certain instances, be good for conservation, but this is a discussion for another time. It’s also true that at present Lion Encounter isn’t actually breaking any laws, even if it is selling its lions into hunting (we know for sure at least that it has sold some its lions in the past). But what I for one feel we need to take issue with here, is the increasingly high likelihood that Lion Encounter is treating its lions unethically in one way or another and deceiving the public.
Visitors to Lion Encounter pay roughly $130 for a “lion walk”, while taking part in a volunteer program costs thousands of dollars per week. Many of the visitors to Lion Encounter, particularly the volunteers, go there believing that they are doing something good for the lions. The testimonies that I have received as well as a number of others that have been shared in the comments sections of articles about Lion Encounter and similar “projects” suggest that many leave feeling saddened, disillusioned and angered by what they have witnessed, and helpless to do anything much about it. How many would ever have spent the money in the first place if they had been better informed?
As another former volunteer concisely summed it up:
“There’s absolutely no benefit to the lions and it is, in my opinion, nothing more than a money making business.”
I recently sat down and discussed all of the above with the private owners and managers of Zambiatourism.com, and happily it was quickly decided that this website should no longer be promoting such activities. We have now used the “Lion Walks” page on this site to rather increase awareness of the criticisms, issues and allegations facing Lion Encounter (as well as other similar operators). You can visit the page here to read more on this topic.
I would also like to encourage anyone who has personally visited Lion Encounter or similar “projects” and operators in the Vic Falls area to share their thoughts in the comments section here, whichever side of the argument they fall on. The same goes for any of the current staff or management at Lion Encounter et al. Open dialogue from both sides is important going forward if things are to change for the better.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not represent the views of the Zambia Tourism Board or the private ownership and management of this website.
I spent a brief 3 weeks in Vic Falls being involved with one of the other projects that African Impact undertakes. This was with a local government school and with the Rose of Charity AIDs orphanage. This gave me a chance to talk to people who lived in Vic Falls (not tourists) and to a small extent understand the difficulties that locals put up with living within a national park. Number 1 were the elephants who broke into gardens and destroyed the food that the locals struggled to grow to feed their families. The second was the various big cats (lions, leopards and some of the smaller unseen wild cats as well as hyenas and possibly wild dogs) that ate goats and cattle that the local villagers needed for transport, milk, food etc. Trying to explain to a family who has had their garden destroyed by elephants or their goats killed by cats why preserving these animals is important can be quite a challenge.
Part of the work ALERT did was take teachers and pupils from the government schools on the walks with lions and also to see the elephants that are ridden to show the value to the community from the tourism $$$$. What I saw of the walking with lions was both positive and negative. The people that worked with the lions genuinely cared for them as well as providing them employment in an area that had very limited opportunities. The animals seemed relaxed and happy and had the opportunity to hunt out on walks. They were well fed and lived in reasonable conditions. I did a number of the walks with tourists and it was interesting to see how people reacted to the animals.
So ALERT (when I was there in 2010) was providing employment at a time and place where unemployment was plus 50%. The animals were well cared for. The people involved in Zim did their best to help the local people understand the indirect financial value to them. Many of the tourists loved it and some of the money they paid did go to paying staff and the costs of the project. Some of the tourists I spoke to had no idea that lions were endangered so maybe they went away with thoughts that hadn’t occurred to them. Some of those tourists went on to Rose of Charity and provided support to the young orphans.
The downside is clearly removing the cubs from their dams at far too young an age. But this happens in many other industries (consider dairying where the calves are removed around 24 hours old. Not nice but needs to be done or there is no milk). What happens after the lions are moved from Vic Falls back to Antelope Park is too opaque and in order to ensure the integrity (?) of the projects there should be much more visibility of tracking of the animals from conception to birth to death.
So is it all about money – well in many ways the answer is yes. Money pays for the children of employees to get an education, it pays the wages of the locals who work in the tourism business so they can buy or grow food. It (probably) pays the necessary gratuities to officials to ensure that business can run (take what you like out of that). The volunteers bring money into Vic Falls as well as the money that goes towards feeding and housing them. Those are only a few things that it pays for.
I cannot speak for David Youldon – never met him and unlikely ever to. But does what he has set up help (as well as not help) lions and communities? I think the answer is a qualified yes. But he and those at ALERT need to up their game as to ensuring the difference between what they do and what the petting zoos do is clear and open.
I went to Zim with a reasonably open mind (am over 50 and an accountant so pretty cynical at the best of times) and learned a lot about people and a little about lions. The question of ensuring the success of wildlife whilst ensuring the welfare of people is extremely complex. Maybe only history will show whether ALERT does help the survival of lions.
This whole thing about breeding wild animals – in this case , the noble lion, for canned hunting sickens me and most thinking people. As an ex South African, and now living iin Australia, where I\\\’ve been for many years, I feel ashamed to have been born there and now witnessing the destruction of the magnificent wildlife that is synonymous with Africa, just adds to my distress. Don\\\’t the ANC and government members both sides realise that tourism is the fastest growing industry worldwide, and that if Adrica loses its lions, elephants, rhinos, etc, the country is going to be worse off financially than it is already. It really is a no brainer. People go to see real live animals, not puppets behind fences!
I heard while in Livingstone over Christmas that they have no less than 57 adolescent/adult lions to ‘rehome.’ If the prospective volunteers can be intercepted and made aware of this farce then he has no financial motive to continue this venture.
I must say, I have been with ALERT and spent two months Victoria Falls and I disagree with a lot of the criticism behind this program. ALERT does not have a one day fix to solve the problem of the rapidly depleting lion population, nor is it affiliated in any way with canned hunting. This is a massive undertaking and many people do not put in the time while they are here to research thoroughly what is happening or take a step back to view it from different perspectives, rather they make up their mind in the first few days and stick with that gut feeling. It will take years to reintroduce lions to the wild. The lions which are walked never see the wild, which is only right being that they do not fear humans. They are put into stage two, in a semi-wild environment (which I have witnessed), and the cubs which are bred their have no human interaction and can eventually be released into the wild if deemed fit. Translocating lions is a band aid to the issue that is a gaping wound. What people neglect to mention about ALERT is what they do in the community. Many Africans HATE lions because they are considered a problem animal that in their eyes simply kills their livestock and threatens their livelihood. ALERT aims to educate younger generations about the plight of the African Lion in hopes that with more support locally they can decrease the chance of poaching and hunting of these beasts. ALERT means well in what they are doing, contrary to what many may think and assume.
I volunteered at ALERT Antelope park several years aga and sadly witnessed the stage 2 lions eat her tiny cub .during a drive. The explanation was that happens in the wild but also another explanation not given by staff was too many adolescent lions in a small fenced enclosure .Several other lions after our visit also had babies and the cubs were eaten as well.They eventually brought in a vet and gave the female lion a hystorectomy and removed her from the group because she was exceptionally aggressive. This stage 2 is suppose to simulate the natural environment . It is just a bigger zoo space withiut the luxory of an on sit vet. I had such mixed emotions after my stay.It is beautiful setting but call it what it is a lion zoo with animal amusements.
Another sad topic just came about. The whole world thought the minister of tourism had put a ban on trophy hunting of big cats. I guess greed and disregard for life is what it’s all about in Zambia. How can anyone take pleasure in killing animals? While the very animals bringing revenue are being slaughtered, most are benefiting by getting their pockets greased by these so called boys with toys. It’s shame the tourism minister does not know anything about conservation and sustainable tourism. Here is the link to these atrocious activities. Not for the faint heart. Way to go Jean Kapata Minister of Art and Tourism. http://www.zambianwatchdog.com/ventriglias-pochers-exposed/
I cannot tell you how happy I am that this topic is gaining more and more attention by the day, well written Chris and good on Zambia Tourism for choosing not to support these projects. I am ashamed to admit I am a former volunteer at Lion Encounter Vic Falls…yeah I was sucked initially but I began seeing flaws within the first few days. So how do you have a constant flow of over-paying willing volunteers who think they’re contributing to lion conservation? Easy….put some baby lions in front of them to play with….go for a walk with lions with dozens of other strangers all clambering to touch the lions who, let’s face it would rather be left alone.
The Lion Encounter Management all whom were non-Zambian (when I was there, perhaps it’s changed) seemed to have this arrogance and sense of thinking they were above the volunteers and especially the staff. In fact I think it was disgusting the way they treated the local employees; especially the guides which most of us bonded well with (and remained friends with to this day).
One thing did alarm me more than most. When questioning “where do the lions go?” or anything similar to the Management, the subject was either swiftly changed or they simply say: “best you look at the website, all the information is on there.” What’s even worse? Try and have a conversation with David Youldon (if you actually do see him long enough, he appears and disappears just as quickly)…He is the mastermind behind Lion Encounter – along with his staff seems to think he has some “higher” status than everyone else. He’s most likely running off to go spend the ridiculous amount of money he’s making from the ignorant volunteers that STILL continue to make there way into, what I think a SCAM. Not to mention the possible money involved in the sale of the lions to wherever it is they end up.
To me, I think the worst part about this whole issue is the exploitation of the African Lion. Some experts are saying that the lion may well be listed as “threatened” soon if not in the very near future. Let’s be REAL here. Lions belong in the wild – viewing these wild lions from a vehicle or on foot with experienced guides in a national park and/or game reserve has always been the top tourism drawcard – what brings people to Africa and brings in healthy revenue. The classic Safari. Real Africa. Not rolling around and playing, petting and walking lions that have been bred to make people money the WRONG way. As mentioned, it’s not confirmed that Lion Encounter supplies lions to the canned hunting industry….but. it’s certainly more than questionable.
Hi Oz. Thank you for your comment. I would love to know more about your experiences. Please get in contact with me on my personal email if you would be willing to speak more to me. You can contact me via my website here: http://www.cawclark.com